WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency on Thursday released what it said was the sole internal email from Edward J. Snowden before he fled with a trove of agency secrets, and officials asserted that the message undercut his argument that he protested the legality of surveillance programs before he released any of the documents he stole to journalists.
The email to the N.S.A. general counsel’s office, dated April 8, 2013, makes no reference to the government’s bulk collection of telephone data or other surveillance or cyberprograms. Nor does it raise concerns about violations of privacy.
Instead, Mr. Snowden was seeking clarification about the hierarchy of laws governing the N.S.A., based on what he had learned in an agency training course about privacy protection rules for handling intercepted information.
By the time the email was sent, Mr. Snowden, who was a private contractor and not an agency employee, had already implanted software in the N.S.A. system that was copying its files automatically. Two months later, the first of those files were made public by journalists who had received them from Mr. Snowden.
The N.S.A. released the email in response to Mr. Snowden’s assertion in an interview with Brian Williams of NBC News that was broadcast on Wednesday night. In the interview, Mr. Snowden said he had raised complaints both in Hawaii and at the N.S.A. headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., about “real problems with the way the N.S.A. was interpreting its legal authorities.”
Now living in Moscow to avoid prosecution in the United States, he said the response he received was “more or less” that he “should stop asking questions.”
The email is from “ejsnowd@nsa.ic.gov,” an address that was taken out of service last year. It cites information in the N.S.A. course about what he calls “The Hierarchy of Governing Authorities and Documents.” Mr. Snowden lists the order of legal authorities this way:
•“US constitution
•Federal Statutes/Presidential Executive Orders (EO)
•Department of Defense (DoD) and Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) regulations
•NSA/CSS Directives and Policies.”
Lesser regulations appear further down. Mr. Snowden was concerned about the second line because “it seems to imply Executive Orders have the same precedence as law.”
A few days later, a lawyer in the N.S.A. general counsel’s office wrote back in an email that begins “Hello Ed” and continues: “Executive Orders (E.O.s) have the ‘force and effect of law.’ That said, you are correct that E.O.’s cannot override a statute.”
Officials who have examined the email said Thursday that they suspected Mr. Snowden was trying to determine whether some espionage activities may have been conducted under executive orders instead of laws passed by Congress. “But we don’t know for sure,” said official who requested anonymity in discussing classified material. “We do know we can’t find other complaints.”
The email was released after the government again found itself on the defensive concerning Mr. Snowden’s revelations. Some administration officials had argued for releasing the document much earlier to rebut Mr. Snowden’s case that he should be regarded as a whistle-blower.
His interview with Mr. Williams was not the first time he said that he had tried to complain about N.S.A. programs in different ways.
“I had reported these clearly problematic programs to more than 10 distinct officials, none of whom took any action to address them,” he said in testimony presented to the European Parliament in March. “As an employee of a private company rather than a direct employee of the U.S. government, I was not protected by U.S. whistle-blower laws, and I would not have been protected from retaliation and legal sanction for revealing classified information about lawbreaking in accordance with the recommended process.”
The Obama administration had resisted releasing the unclassified email from Mr. Snowden, without explaining why. But its hand was forced after the NBC interview, and Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who is chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told administration officials that her panel would release the email, which it did.
“I believe this transparency is important and should also be applied to the communication that Snowden referenced in his recent interview,” she said in a statement. Ms. Feinstein has been among his greatest critics.
Whatever Mr. Snowden’s complaints, it is unlikely any of the most politically sensitive programs would have been changed. President Obama had repeatedly authorized the bulk collection program until he declared in January that it should be phased out. In an overwhelming vote, the House recently passed a bill that would accomplish that task; it must now get Senate approval.
The contention that he sought help is important to Mr. Snowden because it would help establish him as a whistle-blower. “I had raised these complaints not just officially, in writing, through email,” he told Mr. Williams. He said he also complained “to my supervisors, to my colleagues, in more than one office.”
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1rmumwI
via IFTTT
0 comments:
Post a Comment