By Carol Morello and Ruth Eglash,
JERUSALEM — Palestinian leaders regrouped Wednesday over proposals to expand their international voice after falling just one vote short in a U.N. Security Council resolution demanding Israel step up peace efforts and withdraw from occupied lands.
The U.N. measure sought to increase pressure on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and mark another step toward possible Palestinian statehood.
But Tuesday’s vote was strongly opposed by the Obama administration, which favors a negotiated agreement rather than a forced pact or unilateral action by the Palestinians frustrated by the stalled peace process.
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said top officials in the West Bank planned talks that could include setting a timetable to join more groups with global reach such as the International Criminal Court, where the Palestinians could pursue charges against Israel for alleged war crimes.
“There will be no more waiting, no more hesitation, no more slowdown,” Erekat said. “We are going to meet and make decisions.”
In Israel, the government released a statement Wednesday that called the unsuccessful resolution “completely one-sided” and said it lacked “the components that would advance a future agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.”
“The failure of the Palestinian resolution must teach the Palestinians that provocation and attempts to impose unilateral measures on Israel will not achieve anything — to the contrary,” said Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman.
The resolution called for Israelis and Palestinians to strike a peace deal within a year and for Israel to withdraw within three years to its borders before the 1967 war — in which Israel won control of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.
It also declared that East Jerusalem would be the capital of a Palestinian state, a more hard-line stance than an earlier version that described Jerusalem as a shared capital. It also demanded an end to Israeli settlement building.
The resolution fell one vote short of the nine necessary for passage, sparing the United States the need to wield its veto power as one of the council’s five permanent members.
In the days before the vote, Secretary of State John F. Kerry made a flurry of calls to 13 foreign ministers and leaders to express concern that a resolution would only deepen the conflict, U.S. officials said.
Still, the resolution won the backing of several U.S. allies including France and Jordan, which agreed to introduce the measure at the council after it was endorsed by 22 Arab nations.
Five of the 15 countries on the Security Council abstained from the vote, including Britain. Australia was the only country that joined the United States in voting against the resolution.
It remained unclear why the Palestinians wanted to have a vote before Thursday, when the council’s rotating membership changes to include at least two countries sympathetic to Palestinian statehood.
Foreign Minister Lieberman said Tuesday he believed that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas insisted on it for political reasons, including trying to upstage Palestinian rival Hamas. The militant group, which controls Gaza, opposed the resolution as not going far enough.
Morello reported from Washington.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1x43GTb
via IFTTT
0 comments:
Post a Comment