TMC has been quick to dissociate itself from Pal’s remarks. Party spokesman Derek O’Brien tweeted that the statements were “very insensitive”. Photo: HT
Unlike his predecessors who have sought either to justify rape or blame women for the rise in violence against them, Pal’s statements are in a whole new league: For the first time, an elected MP has on camera actually threatened rape as a form of political retribution. Pal has been an MP from Krishnanagar since 2009. “If anyone from the Opposition dares to touch any woman then I will send my boys and get women of CPM raped,” Pal said at a speech in Chouhama village.
Pal has been asked to provide a written explanation to the party within 48 hours. Meanwhile, his wife Nandini Pal has apologized on her husband’s behalf—with a caveat. “The comments need to be seen in context, but he shouldn’t have used the term ‘rape’,” she said. Pal himself claims to have never used the word rape. “I said they should ‘raid’ all people,” he told CNN-IBN.
When people in positions of power make remarks either blaming women for crimes against them or dismissing rape as a “mistake”, they embolden criminals. In May—just weeks after Mulayam’s election rally and Abu Azmi’s remarks—two teenage girls were raped in Badaun and their bodies hung from a tree. A few days later a 19-year-old woman was raped and hung in Moradabad district, one day after another woman was found hanging in Bahraich district.
And on it goes.
Every new statement is followed by a now predictable outpouring of outrage and an equally predictable denial: I was misquoted. I said it in another context. This is a conspiracy by my political opponents. In a matter of days, the controversy is forgotten, until the next one comes along and everybody is huffing and puffing again.
National Crime Records Bureau data for 2013 shows a sharp rise in reported crimes against women, including rape and assault. The number of reported rapes was up from 24,973 in 2012 to 33,707 in 2013. There might not be a direct connection between the rise in crimes and the statements made by politicians, but crimes, particularly against women, flourish in a culture of impunity. When politicians attempt to pin responsibility on women or their skirts or advertising, they provide an alibi to criminals (how could he help it, her skirt was too short, why blame him for just a mistake, etc) and lose their moral authority to remain in power. They become accomplices in violence against women through statements that either directly endorse it or seek to justify it. How do you stem such speech, particularly when it comes from party leaders? Outrage can be effective if it is sustained. Public outrage forced the Karnataka BJP to withdraw an invitation earlier this year to induct Pramod Muthalik, whose Sri Ram Sene had carried out a violent assault in 2009 in a Mangalore pub. And it was public outrage that forced the new laws on rape and crimes against women. But it is also incumbent for parties to send the right message.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1mhExjq
via IFTTT
0 comments:
Post a Comment