Tuesday 31 March 2015

Supreme Court stays trial court order summoning former PM Manmohan Singh ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed a summons issued to former prime minister Manmohan Singh by a special court in connection with a coal scam case.


The apex court took up a petition challenging the summons in a hearing in which Singh also raised the issue of lack of sanction to prosecute him in the case. A Prime Minister has plenary powers and his administrative decisions can't be termed illegal, Kapil Sibal said on behalf of the former PM.


The SC also issued a notice to the Centre on a separate plea challenging the constitutional validity of a provision of the Prevention of Corruption Act.


Singh had on March 25 moved the apex court to contest the March 11, 2015 special court order summoning him as well as Kumarmangalam Birla and the then coal secretary PC Parakh.


The three were summoned for offences of criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, and under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act by the court which rejected the closure report by the Central Bureau of Investigation.


The trial court had issued the summons in connection with the allocation of 15% share in the combined Talabira II and III coal blocks to Kumarmangalam Birla's Hindalco.


Singh's petition described as "ridiculous" the logic behind the summons. It said an administrative decision could be "good or bad" but it was unheard of to introduce criminality into the decision by describing it post-facto as going against public interest.


The petition asked for the special judge's order to be struck down on the grounds that it was bad in law as it failed to fix any specific act of criminality on Singh.


It further argued that Singh cannot be charged with favouritism because there was no coal policy in 2005 when the fields in question were allocated, and so the trial court's proceedings should be stopped.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1CLhFQp

via IFTTT
Read More...

Supreme Court stays trial court order summoning former PM Manmohan Singh ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed a summons issued to former prime minister Manmohan Singh by a special court in connection with a coal scam case.


The apex court took up a petition challenging the summons on Monday. Manmohan Singh on March 25 had moved the apex court to contest the March 11, 2015 special court order summoning him as well as Kumarmangalam Birla and then coal secretary PC Parakh.


The three were summoned for offences of criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, and under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act by the court which rejected the closure report by the Central Bureau of Investigation.


The trial court had issued the summons in connection with the allocation of 15% share in the combined Talabira II and III coal blocks to Kumarmangalam Birla's Hindalco.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1F1k868

via IFTTT
Read More...

Face of anti-tobacco campaign dies after battling cancer, but not before taking on ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Sunita Tomar, who shot to prominence as the face of an anti-tobacco campaign, died after a long battle with mouth cancer in a Mumbai hospital on Wednesday, just two days after expressing her shock at BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi's contention that there were no Indian studies to show tobacco caused cancer and other diseases.


Tomar, 28, died at the Tata Memorial Hospital at 4am, the Indian Express reported. Doctors treating her said they suspected she had suffered a relapse of mouth cancer.


Two days before she died, Tomar wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express her shock at the statement by Gandhi, chairman of Lok Sabha's Committee of Subordinate Legislations, that there are no Indian studies linking tobacco to cancer.


"Recently Dilip Gandhi, chairman of a parliamentary panel, wrote to the Health Ministry asking for the notification on bigger tobacco pack warnings to be kept in abeyance. I was shocked that people in such high posts can be so irresponsible," she wrote.


"Bigger warnings can probably save some innocent lives like mine. You have started to take people along in your Mann Ki Baat where you recently talked about de-addiction. I hope you will also take up the cause of tobacco," she added.


Pankaj Chaturvedi, head and neck surgeon at the Tata Memorial Hospital, where Tomar was admitted three days ago, was quoted as saying: "Sunita came to us three days back with breathing difficulty and weight loss. She had lost 12kg. We were suspecting a relapse. She was just 28 and mother of two young kids.


Video of the anti-tobacco campaign





"Though she is only one of the 10 lakh Indians who die every year because of tobacco, I am sure her campaign must have saved millions from picking up the habit. She made me promise that we will continue our battle and she also wrote a letter to PM Modi to share her personal tragedy," he said.


The Union health ministry postponed a decision to introduce new graphic health warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packages on both sides from April 1 based on the report of the parliamentary panel chaired by Gandhi, the MP from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Along with Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra is one of the major tobacco-growing states of India.


As part of the "Lives Bachao Size Badhao" public awareness campaign that pushed for larger and stronger pictorial warning on tobacco products, Tomar had collected 38,740 signatures through an online and offline petition for implementing the larger health warnings on tobacco packages. The petition was submitted to Union health minister JP Nadda last month.


During an appearance at the unveiling of the anti-tobacco campaign featuring her, Tomar had said she began using tobacco at the age of 22. Four years later, she developed a blister that was diagnosed as cancer, she said.


The wife of a driver, Tomar had to have an entire cheek and her jaw removed. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1DrhIBp

via IFTTT
Read More...

College girl shot dead in Bengaluru - Times of India

Leave a Comment
BENGALURU:An 18-year-old girl was shot dead and her friend injured by an office boy of a residential school here, police said.

The deceased is a second-year pre-university student at the school and was residing at the hostel, they said.


The incident took place last night and investigations are on, police said, adding the boy is suspected to be a jilted lover.


Karnataka home minister K J George, city police chief MN Reddi and other senior officials rushed to the spot.

The suspect is absconding.





(With inputs from PTI)

http://ift.tt/1MxafXb J George,Girl shot dead in Bengaluru


Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1BKXSvl

via IFTTT
Read More...

Face of anti-tobacco campaign dies after battling cancer, but not before taking on ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Sunita Tomar, who shot to prominence as the face of an anti-tobacco campaign, died after a long battle with mouth cancer in a Mumbai hospital on Wednesday, just two days after expressing her shock at BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi's contention that there were no Indian studies to show tobacco caused cancer and other diseases.


Tomar, 28, died at the Tata Memorial Hospital at 4am, the Indian Express reported. Doctors treating her said they suspected she had suffered a relapse of mouth cancer.


Two days before she died, Tomar wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express her shock at the statement by Gandhi, chairman of Lok Sabha's Committee of Subordinate Legislations, that there are no Indian studies linking tobacco to cancer.


"Recently Dilip Gandhi, chairman of a parliamentary panel, wrote to the Health Ministry asking for the notification on bigger tobacco pack warnings to be kept in abeyance. I was shocked that people in such high posts can be so irresponsible," she wrote.


"Bigger warnings can probably save some innocent lives like mine. You have started to take people along in your Mann Ki Baat where you recently talked about de-addiction. I hope you will also take up the cause of tobacco," she added.


Pankaj Chaturvedi, head and neck surgeon at the Tata Memorial Hospital, where Tomar was admitted three days ago, was quoted as saying: "Sunita came to us three days back with breathing difficulty and weight loss. She had lost 12kg. We were suspecting a relapse. She was just 28 and mother of two young kids.


Video of the anti-tobacco campaign





"Though she is only one of the 10 lakh Indians who die every year because of tobacco, I am sure her campaign must have saved millions from picking up the habit. She made me promise that we will continue our battle and she also wrote a letter to PM Modi to share her personal tragedy," he said.


The Union health ministry postponed a decision to introduce new graphic health warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packages on both sides from April 1 based on the report of the parliamentary panel chaired by Gandhi, the MP from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Along with Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra is one of the major tobacco-growing states of India.


As part of the "Lives Bachao Size Badhao" public awareness campaign that pushed for larger and stronger pictorial warning on tobacco products, Tomar had collected 38,740 signatures through an online and offline petition for implementing the larger health warnings on tobacco packages. The petition was submitted to Union health minister JP Nadda last month.


During an appearance at the unveiling of the anti-tobacco campaign featuring her, Tomar had said she began using tobacco at the age of 22. Four years later, she developed a blister that was diagnosed as cancer, she said.


The wife of a driver, Tomar had to have an entire cheek and her jaw removed. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1MxeKRH

via IFTTT
Read More...

College girl shot dead in Bengaluru - Times of India

Leave a Comment
BENGALURU:An 18-year-old girl was shot dead and her friend injured by an office boy of a residential school here, police said.

The deceased is a second-year pre-university student at the school and was residing at the hostel, they said.


The incident took place last night and investigations are on, police said, adding the boy is suspected to be a jilted lover.


Karnataka home minister K J George, city police chief MN Reddi and other senior officials rushed to the spot.

The suspect is absconding.





(With inputs from PTI)

http://ift.tt/1MxafXb J George,Girl shot dead in Bengaluru


Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1C5DogE

via IFTTT
Read More...

Face of anti-tobacco campaign dies after battling cancer, but not before taking on ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Sunita Tomar, who shot to prominence as the face of an anti-tobacco campaign, died after a long battle with mouth cancer in a Mumbai hospital on Wednesday, just two days after expressing her shock at BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi's contention that there were no Indian studies to show tobacco caused cancer and other diseases.


Tomar, 28, died at the Tata Memorial Hospital at 4am, the Indian Express reported. Doctors treating her said they suspected she had suffered a relapse of mouth cancer.


Two days before she died, Tomar wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express her shock at the statement by Gandhi, chairman of Lok Sabha's Committee of Subordinate Legislations, that there are no Indian studies linking tobacco to cancer.


"Recently Dilip Gandhi, chairman of a parliamentary panel, wrote to the Health Ministry asking for the notification on bigger tobacco pack warnings to be kept in abeyance. I was shocked that people in such high posts can be so irresponsible," she wrote.


"Bigger warnings can probably save some innocent lives like mine. You have started to take people along in your Mann Ki Baat where you recently talked about de-addiction. I hope you will also take up the cause of tobacco," she added.


Pankaj Chaturvedi, head and neck surgeon at the Tata Memorial Hospital, where Tomar was admitted three days ago, was quoted as saying: "Sunita came to us three days back with breathing difficulty and weight loss. She had lost 12kg. We were suspecting a relapse. She was just 28 and mother of two young kids.


Video of the anti-tobacco campaign





"Though she is only one of the 10 lakh Indians who die every year because of tobacco, I am sure her campaign must have saved millions from picking up the habit. She made me promise that we will continue our battle and she also wrote a letter to PM Modi to share her personal tragedy," he said.


The Union health ministry postponed a decision to introduce new graphic health warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packages on both sides from April 1 based on the report of the parliamentary panel chaired by Gandhi, the MP from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Along with Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra is one of the major tobacco-growing states of India.


As part of the "Lives Bachao Size Badhao" public awareness campaign that pushed for larger and stronger pictorial warning on tobacco products, Tomar had collected 38,740 signatures through an online and offline petition for implementing the larger health warnings on tobacco packages. The petition was submitted to Union health minister JP Nadda last month.


During an appearance at the unveiling of the anti-tobacco campaign featuring her, Tomar had said she began using tobacco at the age of 22. Four years later, she developed a blister that was diagnosed as cancer, she said.


The wife of a driver, Tomar had to have an entire cheek and her jaw removed. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1C5Dmp9

via IFTTT
Read More...

Face of anti-tobacco campaign dies after battling cancer, but not before taking on ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Sunita Tomar, who shot to prominence as the face of an anti-tobacco campaign, died after a long battle with mouth cancer in a Mumbai hospital on Wednesday, just two days after expressing her shock at BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi's contention that there were no Indian studies to show tobacco caused cancer and other diseases.


Tomar, 28, died at the Tata Memorial Hospital at 4am, the Indian Express reported. Doctors treating her said they suspected she had suffered a relapse of mouth cancer.


Two days before she died, Tomar wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express her shock at the statement by Gandhi, chairman of Lok Sabha's Committee of Subordinate Legislations, that there are no Indian studies linking tobacco to cancer.


"Recently Dilip Gandhi, chairman of a parliamentary panel, wrote to the Health Ministry asking for the notification on bigger tobacco pack warnings to be kept in abeyance. I was shocked that people in such high posts can be so irresponsible," she wrote.


"Bigger warnings can probably save some innocent lives like mine. You have started to take people along in your Mann Ki Baat where you recently talked about de-addiction. I hope you will also take up the cause of tobacco," she added.


Pankaj Chaturvedi, head and neck surgeon at the Tata Memorial Hospital, where Tomar was admitted three days ago, was quoted as saying: "Sunita came to us three days back with breathing difficulty and weight loss. She had lost 12kg. We were suspecting a relapse. She was just 28 and mother of two young kids.


Video of the anti-tobacco campaign





"Though she is only one of the 10 lakh Indians who die every year because of tobacco, I am sure her campaign must have saved millions from picking up the habit. She made me promise that we will continue our battle and she also wrote a letter to PM Modi to share her personal tragedy," he said.


The Union health ministry postponed a decision to introduce new graphic health warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packages on both sides from April 1 based on the report of the parliamentary panel chaired by Gandhi, the MP from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Along with Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra is one of the major tobacco-growing states of India.


As part of the "Lives Bachao Size Badhao" public awareness campaign that pushed for larger and stronger pictorial warning on tobacco products, Tomar had collected 38,740 signatures through an online and offline petition for implementing the larger health warnings on tobacco packages. The petition was submitted to Union health minister JP Nadda last month.


During an appearance at the unveiling of the anti-tobacco campaign featuring her, Tomar had said she began using tobacco at the age of 22. Four years later, she developed a blister that was diagnosed as cancer, she said.


The wife of a driver, Tomar had to have an entire cheek and her jaw removed. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1NHhUPR

via IFTTT
Read More...

SBI may offer stock options, recruit specialists to overhaul debt-heavy sector - Business Today

Leave a Comment

State Bank of India (SBI), the country's largest lender, may offer employee share options, recruit specialists and promote faster - radical changes that promise to shake up a bloated, debt-heavy banking sector.


State-run banks are under pressure to improve profitability and slash bad loans, creating a more agile sector to help fuel economic growth. For the government and the banks, that has put the focus firmly on one issue: people.


"The primary problem we have to solve in the banking sector is of performance and talent," Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha said recently, noting the search for talent was more important even than banks raising capital to meet tougher international regulatory rules.


SBI enjoys greater autonomy than some of its smaller rivals, but even straight-talking Chairperson Arundhati Bhattacharya is wrestling with basic problems ranging from poor pay to the fallout of a 1990s hiring freeze that left state banks with a dearth of senior managers. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has dubbed 2010-20 the "retirement decade".


Like her counterparts, Bhattacharya is grappling with an inflexible recruitment system where mid-career hires of outsiders are unheard of. The country's public sector banks hire largely through a nationwide exam system, bringing in entry-level staff who rise through the ranks over years.


Bhattacharya, whose bank employs more than 215,000 people, is also working with the government to circumvent a 2013 court ruling banning state-run banks from campus recruitment at the country's elite universities, using contracts to pull in much needed specialists, and even consultants for specific expertise.


"Areas like credit, risk, human resources, IT of course, economic research, analytics: wherever we have specialised areas, we can get people laterally on a contract basis," the SBI chief told Reuters in an interview.


This is a departure for banks that long offered only the option of a job for life, offsetting low cash pay with a web of benefits like housing and a generous pension.


"We've flagged to the government that at least a portion of our recruitment we should be able to do from campuses. The government has assured us they are working on this," Bhattacharya said.


This should come as a relief to many in the sector who saw the ban - supposed to enhance democratic hiring - as emblematic of banks' struggles to meet private sector productivity targets while shackled by state constraints.


"They want efficiency, but they are tying our hands," fretted one senior official at a large public sector bank.


TEST CASE


Nearly two dozen state-run lenders dominate the domestic banking sector with more than 70 per cent share of loan assets, but they account for only a third of profits. Bad loan ratios are on average more than double those at private sector counterparts, after years of profligate lending, weak due diligence and government pressure to fund often risky infrastructure projects.


Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has promised greater autonomy for individual banks like SBI, and is also due to allow state-run banks to specialise. Recruitment could test its political will - not least radical moves like the share option scheme being debated by SBI's board.


"It has not yet fully gone through. But we are working on it," Bhattacharya said, adding, "Definitely in the next 12 months you'll see a lot of changes. That much I am quite sure."


The Modi government in February for the first time allowed private sector applicants for the chief executive officer role at five big public sector banks. Pay, the government said, would be "flexible" - a major break for a country that runs state salaries on a schedule.


Requirements around the age limit and the years of board experience could limit public sector candidates who would normally be first pick for a role. But cash could limit the quality of private sector candidates.


SS Mundra, who headed Bank of Baroda - the country's number-two lender - before becoming a deputy governor at the Reserve Bank of India, earned about US $40,000 in 2013-14, a twentieth of ICICI Bank CEO Chanda Kochhar's pay. Jiang Jianqing, chairman of state-controlled Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, took home around US $326,000 in salary, bonus and benefits.


"Compensation levels are on different planets," said a top executive at a large private sector bank.


For younger applicants, security may still sell it - at least for now.


"I want a secure job, an officer's job," said Ganesh Khatua, a university graduate preparing to sit for the bank test.


"I know public sector banks cannot offer the same salary as the private sector for experienced people. The ideal situation would be to switch over (in time)," Khatua added.



(Reuters)


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1xVV5o6

via IFTTT
Read More...

GCTOC Bill 2015: Gujarat Assembly clears stringent anti-terror Bill in third attempt - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment
anandiben patel, Anti terror bill, Gujarat Anti Terror bill Anandiben Patel in Rajkot on Wednesday. (Source: Express Photos)


The Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a stringent anti-terror Bill retaining controversial provisions that had twice earlier led to a previous such Bill being rejected by the President.


The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill 2015 makes only minor changes in the controversial Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill, including adding the word ‘terrorism’ in the name. However, it retains clauses such as permitting admissibility of evidence collected through interception of mobile calls of an accused or through confessions made before an investigating officer, in a court of law.


The Gujarat government, at the time led by Narendra Modi, first introduced the GUJCOC Bill in 2003, with the same clauses, including increasing the period to file chargesheet from 90 to 180 days, and laying down strict conditions for bail to be given to the accused. The Bill was rejected by then President A P J Abdul Kalam in 2004, demanding that the clause relating to interception of communication be removed. The NDA was in power at the time.


The state Assembly passed the GUJCOC Bill again twice after that, each time under Modi as CM. In 2008, it was without the clause objected to by Kalam. But then President Pratibha Patil also refused to clear the Bill, seeking more changes, including deletion of the provision allowing confessions before a police officer as evidence in court. The Centre had a UPA government then.


The Gujarat government, however, ignored Patil’s suggestions and cleared the Bill for the third time in 2009. This Bill is still pending clearance by the President.


The GCTOC Bill, while reintroducing the provision allowing interception of communication and retaining the one relating to confessions made before a police officer, only proposes that the officer concerned be of the rank of superintendent of police and above.


Minister of State for Home Rajnikant Patel, who tabled the GCTOC Bill, argued that the legislation was required for the safety and security of the residents of Gujarat, which shares its border with Pakistan. “Pakistan cannot win the war against India. We all know about terrorist activities in Pakistan. To protect every single citizen from the bullet of terrorists, we need to strengthen the law,” Patel said.


The Congress, which objected to the Bill, eventually abstained from voting on it.


While Gujarat has been relatively peaceful the past 10 years, the Bill’s ‘Statement of Objects of Reasons’ says, “It is noticed that organised criminal syndicates make common cause with terrorist gangs and foster macro terrorism, which extends beyond national boundaries. There is a reason to believe that organised criminal syndicates are operating in the state and… there is immediate need to curb their activities.”


Congress Abdasa MLA Shaktisinh Gohil objected that clauses in the Bill contradicted Central laws that do not allow an investigating agency to take confession and use it as evidence. “Besides, when the Union Act has fixed continued…



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1NHfnW5

via IFTTT
Read More...

Revealed! 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid: They’re Serious This Time

Leave a Comment
Read More...

2016 Chevrolet Malibu: No Yawning—With New Engines, a New Platform, and a New Look, It’s Quite Interesting!

Leave a Comment
Read More...

2016 Chevrolet Malibu: No Yawning! – Official Photos and Info

Leave a Comment
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/1DqMGK1

via IFTTT
Read More...

GCTOC Bill 2015: Gujarat Assembly clears stringent anti-terror Bill in third attempt - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment
anandiben patel, Anti terror bill, Gujarat Anti Terror bill Anandiben Patel in Rajkot on Wednesday. (Source: Express Photos)


The Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a stringent anti-terror Bill retaining controversial provisions that had twice earlier led to a previous such Bill being rejected by the President.


The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill 2015 makes only minor changes in the controversial Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill, including adding the word ‘terrorism’ in the name. However, it retains clauses such as permitting admissibility of evidence collected through interception of mobile calls of an accused or through confessions made before an investigating officer, in a court of law.


The Gujarat government, at the time led by Narendra Modi, first introduced the GUJCOC Bill in 2003, with the same clauses, including increasing the period to file chargesheet from 90 to 180 days, and laying down strict conditions for bail to be given to the accused. The Bill was rejected by then President A P J Abdul Kalam in 2004, demanding that the clause relating to interception of communication be removed. The NDA was in power at the time.


The state Assembly passed the GUJCOC Bill again twice after that, each time under Modi as CM. In 2008, it was without the clause objected to by Kalam. But then President Pratibha Patil also refused to clear the Bill, seeking more changes, including deletion of the provision allowing confessions before a police officer as evidence in court. The Centre had a UPA government then.


The Gujarat government, however, ignored Patil’s suggestions and cleared the Bill for the third time in 2009. This Bill is still pending clearance by the President.


The GCTOC Bill, while reintroducing the provision allowing interception of communication and retaining the one relating to confessions made before a police officer, only proposes that the officer concerned be of the rank of superintendent of police and above.


Minister of State for Home Rajnikant Patel, who tabled the GCTOC Bill, argued that the legislation was required for the safety and security of the residents of Gujarat, which shares its border with Pakistan. “Pakistan cannot win the war against India. We all know about terrorist activities in Pakistan. To protect every single citizen from the bullet of terrorists, we need to strengthen the law,” Patel said.


The Congress, which objected to the Bill, eventually abstained from voting on it.


While Gujarat has been relatively peaceful the past 10 years, the Bill’s ‘Statement of Objects of Reasons’ says, “It is noticed that organised criminal syndicates make common cause with terrorist gangs and foster macro terrorism, which extends beyond national boundaries. There is a reason to believe that organised criminal syndicates are operating in the state and… there is immediate need to curb their activities.”


Congress Abdasa MLA Shaktisinh Gohil objected that clauses in the Bill contradicted Central laws that do not allow an investigating agency to take confession and use it as evidence. “Besides, when the Union Act has fixed continued…



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1GeWTcS

via IFTTT
Read More...

Face of anti-tobacco campaign dies after battling cancer, but not before taking on ... - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

Sunita Tomar, who shot to prominence as the face of an anti-tobacco campaign, died after a long battle with mouth cancer in a Mumbai hospital on Wednesday, just two days after expressing her shock at BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi's contention that there were no Indian studies to show tobacco caused cancer and other diseases.


Tomar, 28, died at the Tata Memorial Hospital at 4am, the Indian Express reported. Doctors treating her said they suspected she had suffered a relapse of mouth cancer.


Two days before she died, Tomar wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express her shock at the statement by Gandhi, chairman of Lok Sabha's Committee of Subordinate Legislations, that there are no Indian studies linking tobacco to cancer.


"Recently Dilip Gandhi, chairman of a parliamentary panel, wrote to the Health Ministry asking for the notification on bigger tobacco pack warnings to be kept in abeyance. I was shocked that people in such high posts can be so irresponsible," she wrote.


"Bigger warnings can probably save some innocent lives like mine. You have started to take people along in your Mann Ki Baat where you recently talked about de-addiction. I hope you will also take up the cause of tobacco," she added.


Pankaj Chaturvedi, head and neck surgeon at the Tata Memorial Hospital, where Tomar was admitted three days ago, was quoted as saying: "Sunita came to us three days back with breathing difficulty and weight loss. She had lost 12kg. We were suspecting a relapse. She was just 28 and mother of two young kids.


Video of the anti-tobacco campaign





"Though she is only one of the 10 lakh Indians who die every year because of tobacco, I am sure her campaign must have saved millions from picking up the habit. She made me promise that we will continue our battle and she also wrote a letter to PM Modi to share her personal tragedy," he said.


The Union health ministry postponed a decision to introduce new graphic health warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packages on both sides from April 1 based on the report of the parliamentary panel chaired by Gandhi, the MP from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Along with Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra is one of the major tobacco-growing states of India.


As part of the "Lives Bachao Size Badhao" public awareness campaign that pushed for larger and stronger pictorial warning on tobacco products, Tomar had collected 38,740 signatures through an online and offline petition for implementing the larger health warnings on tobacco packages. The petition was submitted to Union health minister JP Nadda last month.


During an appearance at the unveiling of the anti-tobacco campaign featuring her, Tomar had said she began using tobacco at the age of 22. Four years later, she developed a blister that was diagnosed as cancer, she said.


The wife of a driver, Tomar had to have an entire cheek and her jaw removed. She was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1CvmSu3

via IFTTT
Read More...

Navy Sails Into Barrage of Bombs in Dramatic Night Rescue of Indians in Yemen - NDTV

Leave a Comment

10 developments in this story:



  1. Amid bombing and fighting all around the port city of Aden, the rescue took place in total darkness, so much that "one hand had to feel for another" said sources.

  2. The evacuees, including 101 women and 28 children, are being taken to the town of Djibouti - across the Red Sea on the horn of Africa - where the Indian Air Force's C-17s are waiting to fly them home.

  3. The navy has released images of the rescued Indians on the helicopter deck of its ship INS Sumitra at the port city of Aden in Yemen.

  4. There are around 4,000 Indians in Yemen. Nearly 750 have been rescued in the middle of Saudi air strikes aimed at forcing Houthi rebels to hand power back to President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi.

  5. 400 were rescued on Monday with the help of a local craft as India waited for clearance to dock its ships in Aden. Soon after it got clearance, the INS Sumitra, which had been waiting outside the Aden harbor, sailed in.

  6. Minister of State for External Affairs VK Singh is in Djibouti to oversee the evacuation efforts. Five diplomats are also stationed there to help.

  7. The evacuation, code named 'Operation Rahat', involves naval and air force craft, two passenger liners - Kavaratti and Coral - and two Air India aircraft.

  8. The planes are waiting at Oman's Muscat, in absence of clearance to fly to Yemeni capital Sana'a.

  9. On Monday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke to the Saudi King Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud. The Saudi king assured him of full assistance in the safe evacuation of the stranded Indians.

  10. Many countries, including Pakistan and China, have rushed their officials, aircraft and ships to evacuate their nationals.



Story First Published: April 01, 2015 09:16 IST


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1OXqsni

via IFTTT
Read More...

2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club: You Definitely Want to Get the Manual – Auto Shows

Leave a Comment
http://ift.tt/1yy9pOt Return to Article

Play Next 2015 Honda S660 Mid-Engine Roadster


PreviousNext




































This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/19HvKCF

via IFTTT
Read More...

CLICK NOW! Mazda Announces Launch Edition Miata, Preorder Website

Leave a Comment
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

[unable to retrieve full-text content]






from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/1bPaBbd

via IFTTT
Read More...

Warships sent to Yemen to provide anti-piracy services - Times of India

Leave a Comment
NEW DELHI: The two Indian warships sent to strife-torn Yemen to evacuate Indians will also provide anti-piracy escort services to the two passenger ships sent to Djibouti Port to bring back stranded nationals, vice chief of the Navy P Murugesan said on Tuesday.

Giving details of the evacuation plan, vice admiral Murugesan, who on Tuesday took over as the vice chief, said the evacuation is being worked out through the sea and air routes.


"Several agencies like Indian Navy, Indian Air Force, Air India are going to participate in this operation," he said speaking to reporters here.


The Navy has dispatched its destroyer INS Mumbai and stealth frigate INS Tarkash for evacuation of Indians besides two passenger ships from Cochin.


"The Indian naval ships will go and evacuate the persons as well as provide anti-piracy escort duties to the various assets deployed for the operation," Murugesan said.


Both Naval ships are capable of carrying people back to India.


While INS Mumbai has a crew of about 350, INS Tarkash has a crew of about 250.


All facilities will be extended to the stranded Indians. Meanwhile, asked about the recent crash of a Naval maritime surveillance aircraft, which claimed two lives, Murugesan said the Dornier was on a live combat mission training.


"It was a pitch dark night, just one or two days after the new moon and it was a training exercises on the possible war scenarios.


"While training in challenging situations, we are after all human beings, certain... the machinery also may fail," he said.


However, the Vice Chief said a Board of Inquiry is one and "only after its report is out, we would be able to know the exact reason behind the crash".



Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1EAR9eu

via IFTTT
Read More...

Gujarat Assembly clears anti-terror Bill in third attempt - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment

The Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a stringent anti-terror Bill retaining controversial provisions that had twice earlier led to a previous such Bill being rejected by the President.


The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill 2015 makes only minor changes in the controversial Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill, including adding the word ‘terrorism’ in the name. However, it retains clauses such as permitting admissibility of evidence collected through interception of mobile calls of an accused or through confessions made before an investigating officer, in a court of law.


The Gujarat government, at the time led by Narendra Modi, first introduced the GUJCOC Bill in 2003, with the same clauses, including increasing the period to file chargesheet from 90 to 180 days, and laying down strict conditions for bail to be given to the accused. The Bill was rejected by then President A P J Abdul Kalam in 2004, demanding that the clause relating to interception of communication be removed. The NDA was in power at the time.


The state Assembly passed the GUJCOC Bill again twice after that, each time under Modi as CM. In 2008, it was without the clause objected to by Kalam. But then President Pratibha Patil also refused to clear the Bill, seeking more changes, including deletion of the provision allowing confessions before a police officer as evidence in court. The Centre had a UPA government then.


The Gujarat government, however, ignored Patil’s suggestions and cleared the Bill for the third time in 2009. This Bill is still pending clearance by the President.


The GCTOC Bill, while reintroducing the provision allowing interception of communication and retaining the one relating to confessions made before a police officer, only proposes that the officer concerned be of the rank of superintendent of police and above.


Minister of State for Home Rajnikant Patel, who tabled the GCTOC Bill, argued that the legislation was required for the safety and security of the residents of Gujarat, which shares its border with Pakistan. “Pakistan cannot win the war against India. We all know about terrorist activities in Pakistan. To protect every single citizen from the bullet of terrorists, we need to strengthen the law,” Patel said.


The Congress, which objected to the Bill, eventually abstained from voting on it.


While Gujarat has been relatively peaceful the past 10 years, the Bill’s ‘Statement of Objects of Reasons’ says, “It is noticed that organised criminal syndicates make common cause with terrorist gangs and foster macro terrorism, which extends beyond national boundaries. There is a reason to believe that organised criminal syndicates are operating in the state and… there is immediate need to curb their activities.”


Congress Abdasa MLA Shaktisinh Gohil objected that clauses in the Bill contradicted Central laws that do not allow an investigating agency to take confession and use it as evidence. “Besides, when the Union Act has fixed chargesheet filing period as 90 days, where is the need for continued…


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1EAR8Y7

via IFTTT
Read More...

Gujarat Assembly clears anti-terror Bill in third attempt - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment

The Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a stringent anti-terror Bill retaining controversial provisions that had twice earlier led to a previous such Bill being rejected by the President.


The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill 2015 makes only minor changes in the controversial Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill, including adding the word ‘terrorism’ in the name. However, it retains clauses such as permitting admissibility of evidence collected through interception of mobile calls of an accused or through confessions made before an investigating officer, in a court of law.


The Gujarat government, at the time led by Narendra Modi, first introduced the GUJCOC Bill in 2003, with the same clauses, including increasing the period to file chargesheet from 90 to 180 days, and laying down strict conditions for bail to be given to the accused. The Bill was rejected by then President A P J Abdul Kalam in 2004, demanding that the clause relating to interception of communication be removed. The NDA was in power at the time.


The state Assembly passed the GUJCOC Bill again twice after that, each time under Modi as CM. In 2008, it was without the clause objected to by Kalam. But then President Pratibha Patil also refused to clear the Bill, seeking more changes, including deletion of the provision allowing confessions before a police officer as evidence in court. The Centre had a UPA government then.


The Gujarat government, however, ignored Patil’s suggestions and cleared the Bill for the third time in 2009. This Bill is still pending clearance by the President.


The GCTOC Bill, while reintroducing the provision allowing interception of communication and retaining the one relating to confessions made before a police officer, only proposes that the officer concerned be of the rank of superintendent of police and above.


Minister of State for Home Rajnikant Patel, who tabled the GCTOC Bill, argued that the legislation was required for the safety and security of the residents of Gujarat, which shares its border with Pakistan. “Pakistan cannot win the war against India. We all know about terrorist activities in Pakistan. To protect every single citizen from the bullet of terrorists, we need to strengthen the law,” Patel said.


The Congress, which objected to the Bill, eventually abstained from voting on it.


While Gujarat has been relatively peaceful the past 10 years, the Bill’s ‘Statement of Objects of Reasons’ says, “It is noticed that organised criminal syndicates make common cause with terrorist gangs and foster macro terrorism, which extends beyond national boundaries. There is a reason to believe that organised criminal syndicates are operating in the state and… there is immediate need to curb their activities.”


Congress Abdasa MLA Shaktisinh Gohil objected that clauses in the Bill contradicted Central laws that do not allow an investigating agency to take confession and use it as evidence. “Besides, when the Union Act has fixed chargesheet filing period as 90 days, where is the need for continued…


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1yy2zZ9

via IFTTT
Read More...

Malaysia denies royal pardon for jailed opposition leader Anwar - Channel News Asia

Leave a Comment

Malaysia has rejected a petition seeking a royal pardon for jailed opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, who is serving a five-year prison term for sodomy, court officials and his lawyers said on Wednesday.




KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia has rejected a petition seeking a royal pardon for jailed opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, who is serving a five-year prison term for sodomy, court officials and his lawyers said on Wednesday.


The petition was filed by Anwar's family in February after his sentence was upheld by Malaysia's highest court. A pardons board said Anwar's sentence would be maintained but gave no explanation for the decision.


"We would definitely be appealing on the leave rejection, and we will be asking for further information as to what is going on," said Latheefa Koya, one of Anwar's lawyers.


Anwar, who once posed the greatest threat to Malaysia's long-ruling coalition, was found guilty of sodomising a former aide, a charge that he said was a politically motivated attempt to end his career.


He was head of a three-party opposition alliance that made stunning gains in the 2013 election, which for the first time raised the prospect of a genuine challenge to the coalition that has ruled Malaysia since independence in 1957.


Anwar was the ruling party's rising star in the 1990s until he fell out with then prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. His family and political party have voiced concern about his health and conditions in prison since his sentence was upheld.


His last legal option is to file a judicial review with the Federal Court. His lawyers said no decision had been made yet on such an application.


The rejection of the royal pardon came after a series of rallies organised by Anwar's People's Justice Party (PJP) after his imprisonment, although turnout was low at the latest rally last week.


Anwar's daughter, PJP member of parliament Nurul Izzah, was caught up in a recent crackdown by the government and police under Malaysia's Sedition Act. She was held in detention for one night for comments made in parliament that were deemed "contemptuous" of Malaysia's judiciary.


(Reporting By Trinna Leong; Writing By Al-Zaquan Amer Hamzah; Editing by Paul Tait)




This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1xVEalC

via IFTTT
Read More...

Gujarat anti-terror Bill is a replica of POTA with saffron lipstick - IBNLive

Leave a Comment

The BJP government in Gujarat passed the contentious Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Bill (GCTOC) on March 31. Rejected on three earlier occasions by two Presidents (President Kalam and President Pratibha Patil) for violating basic principles of justice, this bill is a modified version of the 2003 law that originated during Modi's regime as chief minister. Before this issue degenerates into the typical either/or debate: Either we protect our people from terror or we protect our most cherished principles let me state this unequivocally that this is a false choice. Here's why.


It would be pertinent to note that in 2004, the central government headed by BJP's very own Bharat Ratna Atal Behari Vajpayee, had sought the return of the bill back to Gujarat government, asking for 'major changes'. The Congress-led UPA government later on, continued with position taken by the previous NDA government and when the bill was passed this time around, in the Gujarat Assembly yet again, the Congress abstained from voting. The BJP has a majority in the Gujarat Assembly and hence the bill sailed through, notwithstanding the boycott by the opposition and the larger questions on legality and constitutional propriety, that remain unaddressed!


The bill in question has Modi's fingerprints all over. Modi not only pioneered this law but pursued it as an article of faith and that saw Gujarat government pass the law four times in 12 years- 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2015! In all these instances, despite the reservations expressed by the President, the Gujarat government continued to push with provisions in the bill, that prima-facie seemed ultra vires the constitution and violative of fundamental rights and civil liberties. The current bill is old wine in new bottle and in many ways worse than POTA and TADA which had been repealed. The worrying provisions continue to remain in the bill.


Gujarat anti-terror Bill is a replica of POTA with saffron lipstick

The Sessions Court in Anand, Gujarat.


The bill seek to give police far reaching powers to make arbitrary arrests, present confessions in custody as evidence as per clause 16 which is currently inadmissible as such and to even intercept phone calls as per clause 14! The bill provides for extending the period of investigation from the stipulated 90 days to 180 days. It makes offenses under the bill non-bailable. It also grants, vide section 25, immunity from legal action to the state government and its officers against suits, proceedings and prosecutions for anything they do in 'good faith in pursuance of the Act'. A prima facie reading of these provisions itself shows that these provisions are not just an assault on our commitment to civil liberties, enshrined in the Constitution and international/ United Nation Conventions which have been ratified by India but also violative of the guarantees of Fundamental Rights, which are an inalienable part of the constitution. Modi's pet law would encourage police officers to use torture to extract confessions or would encourage them to make indiscriminate use of snooping and phone taps in the name of 'security concerns', sometimes in the case of political rivals and dissenters too and not just anti-national elements! They would end up making Gujarat a 'Police state' no different from China and North Korea!


Protection against self incrimination is guaranteed by Article 20(3), right to privacy and protection from illegal phone tapping, protection from arbitrary arrests is safeguarded against by Article 21 which clearly states that 'No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.' This provision is our equivalent of USA's 'due process' clause. Judicial review by the High courts and Supreme Court, of executive action and policy is also part of the basic structure of our constitution. Making laws which run contrary to these would immediately make them vulnerable to being struck down as 'ultra vires' and unconstitutional. This is exactly what the Supreme Court did in the case of Section 66A as well.


Giving law enforcement agencies the tools they need to investigate suspicious activities is one thing and it's the right thing; but doing it without any real oversight or contrary to constitutional safeguards seriously jeopardizes the rights of all Indians and the ideals our nation stands for. This bill will only alienate scores of minorities who have in the past, as per hard data and records, been at the receiving end of illegalities of such bad laws. It will hurt the trust quotient and social cohesion in our society that is essential to fight terrorism. While introducing this law, the Gujarat Home Minister said this bill was the "need of the hour" to fight terror especially with " Pakistan become the epicentre of world terror ". It betrays the sense of fear and communal politics that has driven the passage of this bill. Fighting terror cannot happen with laws that curb our freedoms and damage our own social fabric. We don't have to settle for this bill, which is essentially a replica of "POTA with saffron lipstick". We don't have to settle for a law that sacrifices our liberties or our safety. We can have one that secures both. This one does neither.


(DISCLAIMER - Shezhad Poonawalla is a known Congress supporter and lawyer. Views are personal and not that of CNN-IBN and IBNLIVE)



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1IiDYg9

via IFTTT
Read More...

Gujarat anti-terror Bill is a replica of POTA with saffron lipstick - IBNLive

Leave a Comment

The BJP government in Gujarat passed the contentious Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Bill (GCTOC) on March 31. Rejected on three earlier occasions by two Presidents (President Kalam and President Pratibha Patil) for violating basic principles of justice, this bill is a modified version of the 2003 law that originated during Modi's regime as chief minister. Before this issue degenerates into the typical either/or debate: Either we protect our people from terror or we protect our most cherished principles let me state this unequivocally that this is a false choice. Here's why.


It would be pertinent to note that in 2004, the central government headed by BJP's very own Bharat Ratna Atal Behari Vajpayee, had sought the return of the bill back to Gujarat government, asking for 'major changes'. The Congress-led UPA government later on, continued with position taken by the previous NDA government and when the bill was passed this time around, in the Gujarat Assembly yet again, the Congress abstained from voting. The BJP has a majority in the Gujarat Assembly and hence the bill sailed through, notwithstanding the boycott by the opposition and the larger questions on legality and constitutional propriety, that remain unaddressed!


The bill in question has Modi's fingerprints all over. Modi not only pioneered this law but pursued it as an article of faith and that saw Gujarat government pass the law four times in 12 years- 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2015! In all these instances, despite the reservations expressed by the President, the Gujarat government continued to push with provisions in the bill, that prima-facie seemed ultra vires the constitution and violative of fundamental rights and civil liberties. The current bill is old wine in new bottle and in many ways worse than POTA and TADA which had been repealed. The worrying provisions continue to remain in the bill.


Gujarat anti-terror Bill is a replica of POTA with saffron lipstick

The Sessions Court in Anand, Gujarat.


The bill seek to give police far reaching powers to make arbitrary arrests, present confessions in custody as evidence as per clause 16 which is currently inadmissible as such and to even intercept phone calls as per clause 14! The bill provides for extending the period of investigation from the stipulated 90 days to 180 days. It makes offenses under the bill non-bailable. It also grants, vide section 25, immunity from legal action to the state government and its officers against suits, proceedings and prosecutions for anything they do in 'good faith in pursuance of the Act'. A prima facie reading of these provisions itself shows that these provisions are not just an assault on our commitment to civil liberties, enshrined in the Constitution and international/ United Nation Conventions which have been ratified by India but also violative of the guarantees of Fundamental Rights, which are an inalienable part of the constitution. Modi's pet law would encourage police officers to use torture to extract confessions or would encourage them to make indiscriminate use of snooping and phone taps in the name of 'security concerns', sometimes in the case of political rivals and dissenters too and not just anti-national elements! They would end up making Gujarat a 'Police state' no different from China and North Korea!


Protection against self incrimination is guaranteed by Article 20(3), right to privacy and protection from illegal phone tapping, protection from arbitrary arrests is safeguarded against by Article 21 which clearly states that 'No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.' This provision is our equivalent of USA's 'due process' clause. Judicial review by the High courts and Supreme Court, of executive action and policy is also part of the basic structure of our constitution. Making laws which run contrary to these would immediately make them vulnerable to being struck down as 'ultra vires' and unconstitutional. This is exactly what the Supreme Court did in the case of Section 66A as well.


Giving law enforcement agencies the tools they need to investigate suspicious activities is one thing and it's the right thing; but doing it without any real oversight or contrary to constitutional safeguards seriously jeopardizes the rights of all Indians and the ideals our nation stands for. This bill will only alienate scores of minorities who have in the past, as per hard data and records, been at the receiving end of illegalities of such bad laws. It will hurt the trust quotient and social cohesion in our society that is essential to fight terrorism. While introducing this law, the Gujarat Home Minister said this bill was the "need of the hour" to fight terror especially with " Pakistan become the epicentre of world terror ". It betrays the sense of fear and communal politics that has driven the passage of this bill. Fighting terror cannot happen with laws that curb our freedoms and damage our own social fabric. We don't have to settle for this bill, which is essentially a replica of "POTA with saffron lipstick". We don't have to settle for a law that sacrifices our liberties or our safety. We can have one that secures both. This one does neither.


(DISCLAIMER - Shezhad Poonawalla is a known Congress supporter and lawyer. Views are personal and not that of CNN-IBN and IBNLIVE)



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1Dm7PVw

via IFTTT
Read More...

Anti-terror bill will ensure strict punishment, says Gujarat govt - Zee News

Leave a Comment

New Delhi: The Gujarat Government on Tuesday defended the controversial anti-terror bill, saying it will ensure strict punishment for anti-social elements and help the police in investigating terror cases.


"This anti-terror law has provisions which will ensurestrict punishment is given to anti-social elements," said Gujarat government spokesperson Nitin Patel.


"Those who are involved in terrorism, anti-national activities and organised crimes get acquitted due to the provisions of the laws that we have now. The police investigation is not proved in the court. The provisions in this Bill will help the police in investigation and the evidence they garner," he added.


The Gujarat Assembly earlier in the day passed the controversial Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Bill 2015 that makes confessions before police admissible in court.


The bill that aims to empower law enforcing authorities to intercept and record phone calls as evidence was earlier returned by two presidents to the state government for reconsideration.


The bill also puts the onus of proving innocence on an accused.


The legislation is a modified version of the original 2003 Gujarat Control of Organized Crime Bill which was not cleared by the earlier NDA and UPA governments.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1CHP7ae

via IFTTT
Read More...

Javadekar dismisses BJP MP's remarks on tobacco consumption - Livemint

Leave a Comment
Govt suspends plans for warnings on cigarette packets

The government announced last year that tobacco companies would have to stamp warnings across most of the surface of packets from 1 April. Photo: Bloomberg




India has suspended plans for bigger health warnings on cigarette packets, the health minister told AFP on Tuesday, after a committee of lawmakers demanded local evidence that smoking causes cancer.


The government announced last year that tobacco companies would have to stamp warnings across most of the surface of packets from 1 April, joining countries such as Australia and more recently Britain with tough packaging rules.


But health minister Jagat Prakash Nadda said the plans—for warnings and a picture of damage caused by smoking across 85% of packets—had now been delayed.


“We have put the order in abeyance as the parliamentary committee wants to deliberate on some issues. We stand by our commitment to introduce new picture warnings,” he said, adding that its introduction would be “delayed a bit”.


The move is a major setback for health activists who have been campaigning for an increase from the current 20% of packet surface which written warnings now cover.


A parliamentary panel, which is examining proposed legislative changes on the issue, asked the government this month to stall its plans, citing no Indian study linking smoking with cancer.


“There is no Indian survey report to prove that tobacco consumption leads to cancer. All the studies are done abroad,” parliamentary panel head Dilip Gandhi told AFP.


Gandhi, a lawmaker from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the panel did not “dispute the harmful effects of smoking but cannot copy paste studies conducted abroad”.


He also warned that millions of farmers and others employed in India’s tobacco industry would lose their jobs if cigarette sales dropped as a result of the new packaging.


Gandhi is from Maharashtra, one of India’s major tobacco-growing states.


Up to 900,000 Indians die every year from causes related to tobacco use, the government has said. India will record 1.5 million tobacco-related deaths annually by 2020, according to estimates by the International Tobacco Control Project.



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1Gccp9v

via IFTTT
Read More...

Tobacco warnings put on hold, BJP lawmaker wants research on cancer link - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

India has postponed its decision to implement pictorial warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packaging from April 1 after a parliamentary committee recommended it needed time to measure the economic impact of the decision on tobacco farmers.


BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi, who is the chairperson of the Committee on Subordinate Legislation, wants India to do its own studies to prove tobacco causes cancer. "There is no Indian survey report to prove that tobacco consumption leads to cancer. All the studies are done abroad. Cancer does not happen only because of tobacco. We have to study the Indian context, as four crore people in states like Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh are dependent on bidi-making through Tendupatta," Gandhi told reporters.


Gandhi, in a letter to Union Health Minister J P Nadda, recommended the decision to implement labeling be postponed as "the impact of the notification on workers and manufacturers of the bidi/cigarette and tobacco industry in India and its financial impact as a whole on the revenue needs to be examined."


Public health activists, who had been working endlessly to ensure government of India takes measures to dissuade people from consuming tobacco or related products that included enhanced pictorial pack warnings, protested against the delay in implementation of the notification.


"An estimated 15% tobacco users are between the age group of 13 years and 15 years in India, and we fear this is gross underestimation. Nearly one-third of the current tobacco users are children," said Padmini Somani from Salaam Bombay Foundation.


Some MPs are also criticizing Gandhi's bizarre stand. "Tobacco causes cancer is realty. My father has been an oral cancer survivor for nearly 15 years now and I have experienced the suffering first hand. We recently lost a colleague RR Patil, who was like an elder brother, to cancer due to tobacco," said Supriya Sule, Lok Sabha MP, Nationalist Congress Party.


"We are not looking at complete ban overnight as we do understand the need for creating alternate jobs, so it can happen gradually," she said.


In October last year, the government had announced new pictorial health warnings for tobacco products that were to come into effect from April 1, this year.


A notification was also released requiring tobacco manufacturing companies to devote at least 85% of the surface areas of all tobacco products on both sides to graphically and literally represent the statuary warning.


"Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, a treaty that India has signed, says about 50% should be covered under pictorial pack warnings. India currently is abiding by 40% on just one side, which translates into 20% in total," says Dr Monika Arora from Public Health Foundation of India.


Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi, Professor, Head and Neck Surgeon Tata Memorial Hospital, says, "Tobacco Industry all over the world has admitted that their product is harmful, therefore, they agreed to adopt pack warning as part of their manufacturer liability."


"In fact, tobacco is the only consumer product that has no good use whatsoever apart of killing every third consumer. Tobacco is attributable cause of 50% cancers in India and majority of lung or heart diseases," he added.


Video: BJP MP wants research on tobacco-cancer link


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1IMA5Rq

via IFTTT
Read More...

SC refuses to budge on ouster of Jat community from OBC list - The Hindu

Leave a Comment

On March 17, the SC had quashed a notification issued by the UPA govt. including the Jat community in the Central OBC list.


Standing firm by its March 17 judgment on removing Jat community from the Central list of Other Backward Classes, the Supreme Court, on Tuesday, refused relief to a group of medical students caught midway between the examination and admission processes when the apex court pronounced the verdict.


On March 17, this year, a bench led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi quashed a March 4, 2014 notification issued by the UPA government including the Jat community in the Central OBC list.


The students had moved the Supreme Court last week seeking clarification on their fate – that is of those who had already applied for admission under the OBC category prior to the judgment.


They contended that future of students like them, who appeared in All India Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examination (AIPGDEE) 2015 and All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination (AIPGMEE) 2015 and secured ranks in OBC category has now become uncertain.


The students pointed out that different institutions, including the Delhi University, had drawn fresh lists of candidates post the March 17 verdict. They said, now, they are being considered under the General Category.


“The candidates are bound to suffer heavy losses in the form of an academic year, time and resources, if the said judgment is allowed to apply to candidates who are in a transitory phase in the process of completing admission and enrollment,” their application said.


However, a Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Fali Nariman, dismissed their contentions, while observing that “no vested rights could be created” in their favour post the judgment.


Justice Gogoi, who authored the March 17 judgment, however observed that admissions made under the Jat quota prior to the date of judgment would remain effective as their rights have been “crystallised”.



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1CHDQa7

via IFTTT
Read More...

Javadekar dismisses BJP MP's remarks on tobacco consumption - Livemint

Leave a Comment
Govt suspends plans for warnings on cigarette packets

The government announced last year that tobacco companies would have to stamp warnings across most of the surface of packets from 1 April. Photo: Bloomberg




India has suspended plans for bigger health warnings on cigarette packets, the health minister told AFP on Tuesday, after a committee of lawmakers demanded local evidence that smoking causes cancer.


The government announced last year that tobacco companies would have to stamp warnings across most of the surface of packets from 1 April, joining countries such as Australia and more recently Britain with tough packaging rules.


But health minister Jagat Prakash Nadda said the plans—for warnings and a picture of damage caused by smoking across 85% of packets—had now been delayed.


“We have put the order in abeyance as the parliamentary committee wants to deliberate on some issues. We stand by our commitment to introduce new picture warnings,” he said, adding that its introduction would be “delayed a bit”.


The move is a major setback for health activists who have been campaigning for an increase from the current 20% of packet surface which written warnings now cover.


A parliamentary panel, which is examining proposed legislative changes on the issue, asked the government this month to stall its plans, citing no Indian study linking smoking with cancer.


“There is no Indian survey report to prove that tobacco consumption leads to cancer. All the studies are done abroad,” parliamentary panel head Dilip Gandhi told AFP.


Gandhi, a lawmaker from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the panel did not “dispute the harmful effects of smoking but cannot copy paste studies conducted abroad”.


He also warned that millions of farmers and others employed in India’s tobacco industry would lose their jobs if cigarette sales dropped as a result of the new packaging.


Gandhi is from Maharashtra, one of India’s major tobacco-growing states.


Up to 900,000 Indians die every year from causes related to tobacco use, the government has said. India will record 1.5 million tobacco-related deaths annually by 2020, according to estimates by the International Tobacco Control Project.



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/19ESovh

via IFTTT
Read More...

Tobacco warnings put on hold, BJP lawmaker wants research on cancer link - Hindustan Times

Leave a Comment

India has postponed its decision to implement pictorial warnings that cover 85% of tobacco packaging from April 1 after a parliamentary committee recommended it needed time to measure the economic impact of the decision on tobacco farmers.


BJP MP Dilip Kumar Gandhi, who is the chairperson of the Committee on Subordinate Legislation, wants India to do its own studies to prove tobacco causes cancer. "There is no Indian survey report to prove that tobacco consumption leads to cancer. All the studies are done abroad. Cancer does not happen only because of tobacco. We have to study the Indian context, as four crore people in states like Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh are dependent on bidi-making through Tendupatta," Gandhi told reporters.


Gandhi, in a letter to Union Health Minister J P Nadda, recommended the decision to implement labeling be postponed as "the impact of the notification on workers and manufacturers of the bidi/cigarette and tobacco industry in India and its financial impact as a whole on the revenue needs to be examined."


Public health activists, who had been working endlessly to ensure government of India takes measures to dissuade people from consuming tobacco or related products that included enhanced pictorial pack warnings, protested against the delay in implementation of the notification.


"An estimated 15% tobacco users are between the age group of 13 years and 15 years in India, and we fear this is gross underestimation. Nearly one-third of the current tobacco users are children," said Padmini Somani from Salaam Bombay Foundation.


Some MPs are also criticizing Gandhi's bizarre stand. "Tobacco causes cancer is realty. My father has been an oral cancer survivor for nearly 15 years now and I have experienced the suffering first hand. We recently lost a colleague RR Patil, who was like an elder brother, to cancer due to tobacco," said Supriya Sule, Lok Sabha MP, Nationalist Congress Party.


"We are not looking at complete ban overnight as we do understand the need for creating alternate jobs, so it can happen gradually," she said.


In October last year, the government had announced new pictorial health warnings for tobacco products that were to come into effect from April 1, this year.


A notification was also released requiring tobacco manufacturing companies to devote at least 85% of the surface areas of all tobacco products on both sides to graphically and literally represent the statuary warning.


"Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, a treaty that India has signed, says about 50% should be covered under pictorial pack warnings. India currently is abiding by 40% on just one side, which translates into 20% in total," says Dr Monika Arora from Public Health Foundation of India.


Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi, Professor, Head and Neck Surgeon Tata Memorial Hospital, says, "Tobacco Industry all over the world has admitted that their product is harmful, therefore, they agreed to adopt pack warning as part of their manufacturer liability."


"In fact, tobacco is the only consumer product that has no good use whatsoever apart of killing every third consumer. Tobacco is attributable cause of 50% cancers in India and majority of lung or heart diseases," he added.


Video: BJP MP wants research on tobacco-cancer link


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1FdAIlP

via IFTTT
Read More...

SC notice to Advani, Joshi over Babri demolition (Third Lead) - Business Standard

Leave a Comment


The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to BJP leaders L.K. Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi and 17 others on a petition challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict discharging them of criminal conspiracy in the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992.Besides the two, union minister Uma Bharti and Rajasthan Governor Kalyan Singh -- who was Uttar Pradesh chief minister when the mosque was razed -- have also been issued notice.The Allahabad High Court on May 20, 2010 absolved them of the charge of criminal conspiracy that led to the razing of the 16th century mosque in the Uttar Pradesh town of Ayodhya on December 6, 1992.An apex court bench of Chief Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra issued the notice as counsel Kapil Sibal told the court that a fresh application had been moved by Haji Mahboob Ahmed challenging the high court verdict.The apex court also gave the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) four weeks to get the papers to support its case challenging the discharge of Advani and others.Additional Solicitor General Neeraj Kishan Kaul told the apex court that the CBI had filed an affidavit explaining the delay in filing the petition challenging the high court ruling.The apex court, while noting that delay in filing the petition by the CBI was on account of its drafting and approval by the central government\'s senior law officer, said that the then bench of Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar on February 4, 2013 had asked the government to file an affidavit to explain the reasons for the delay.Allowing four weeks\' time, the court said it would hear the matter on the question of both delay and merits.The CBI moved the apex court on February 18, 2011, nearly nine months after the Allahabad High Court verdict. The notice on the CBI plea was issued on March 3, 2011.The CBI said in its appeal before the apex court that the high court ruling discharging Advani and others of the offence of criminal conspiracy \"is inconsistent with the previous judgment rendered by the Allahabad High Court on February 12, 2001\".The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court had held that the trial court committed no illegality in taking \"cognizance of joint consolidated chargesheet\" and \"all the offences were committed in the course of the same transaction to accomplish the conspiracy\".The high court had noted that the \"evidence for all the offences was almost the same\".The other accused in the case include Vinay Katiyar, Ashok Singhal, Giriraj Kishore, Hari Dalmiya, Uma Bharti, Sadhvi Rithambara and Mahant Avaidyanath.Giriraj Kishore and Mahant Avaidyanath have passed away, and their names will be taken off.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1FdAKub

via IFTTT
Read More...

Babri Masjid demolition: SC to hear plea claiming CBI may go soft on Advani - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment

advani The Supreme Court has agreed to hear on Tuesday a petition, which claims that with the BJP in power, CBI may not make adequate efforts to get conspiracy charges restored against party leader L K Advani and others in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The plea has been filed by Haji Mehboob, a petitioner in the title suit representing the Muslim community in Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi case.


Mehboob, 77, has said his fears stem from the fact that Rajnath Singh, an accused in the case, was now Home Minister and his ministry had administrative control over CBI. Also, another accused, Kalyan Singh, was now Governor of Rajasthan.


Mehboob, who said his house was among the many burnt in the violence that followed the demolition, has requested the court to let him intervene and argue as a party in the case irrespective of CBI’s appeal since the agency’s intentions were doubtful. He said his petition ought to be heard on merits to ensure the matter is not botched up.


“One accused of the said criminal trial, Shri Rajnath Singh, is a cabinet minister and the leader against whom there is a charge of serious omission. One other accused (Kalyan Singh) is Governor of a state. Although CBI is technically under the office of Prime Minister but for all practical purposes, the Home Minister is also an important authority,” stated the petition.


The plea that said due to the change in political scenario, litigation policy of the Centre and statutory authorities had changed their stand. “There are reliable reports… CBI may not seriously press the said petition in its true intent and spirit,” it said and added: “It is necessary that a public spirited person takes up the issue to test the impugned judgment of Allahabad High Court in the judicial scrutiny before this Court”.


The matter was mentioned before Chief Justice H L Dattu Monday for an urgent listing and he agreed to hear it with the main matter Tuesday. The main matter relates to CBI’s appeal against decisions of a special CBI court and High Court to drop criminal conspiracy charge against Advani, Kalyan Singh, Uma Bharti, Vinay Katiyar, Murli Manohar Joshi and others.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1I0plS4

via IFTTT
Read More...

Land Bill: Gadkari accuses Sonia Gandhi of 'misleading' the country, challenges ... - The Indian Express

Leave a Comment
Land bill, Nitin Gadkari, SOnia Gandhi, Gadkari Land bill, Sonia Gandhi land bill Union Minister for Transport Nitin Gadkari


Accusing Congress president Sonia Gandhi of “misleading” the country and the party-led UPA of indulging in populist measures to lure voters without taking the country’s interests into account, Union Minister Nitin Gadkari Monday asked her to “think beyond politics” for the interest of the nation.


Gadkari challenged Sonia for an open debate over the land bill, arguing democracy demands debate over welfare measures and leaders should not shy away from it.


Responding to the Congress chief’s letter on Land Acquisition Bill, Gadkari, the government’s point person for evolving a consensus on the controversial legislation, said that not a single acre of land was acquired under the land acquisition bill passed by the UPA in 2013 for irrigation and other rural and social infrastructure projects and farmers remained dependent on rain all the time.


“Congress governments in Maharashtra, Haryana and Assam had submitted that such a provision would derail irrigation schemes and housing projects for the poor as they take longer than five years for completion… Soniaji, due to the policies of your government farmers always depended on rain and kept waiting for official relief. We have not done away with social impact assessment but given states the right for it,” Gadkari said adding that most land acquisition done by states is for irrigation.


“Under your land law, government and private firms which are allocated coal blocks can acquire thousands of acres of land with doing social impact assessment but states would have to go through this complex exercise if they need one acre of land for a school or hospital and rural road,” Gadkari wrote. “Will it be proper? The Maharashtra CM belonging to your party had then sought that such a bill be studied by a group of CMs. But UPA did not find it appropriate to evolve a consensus among its own CMs,” the letter said.


Criticising the NDA government for being “blatantly anti-farmer and anti-poor”, Gandhi had last week written to Gadkari saying her party will never endorse any law “that will break the backbone of this nation”.


The minister also alleged that the Congress-led government created a system to help the big firms. Rejecting the charges that the NDA’s version of the land bill was anti-farmer Gadkari said: “Your government came out with subsidy programmes to get votes of farmers and rural youth. Our government’s law is in the interest of villages, poor, farmers and labourers.”


(PTI inputs)



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.






from Top Stories - Google News http://ift.tt/1C1wCbS

via IFTTT
Read More...